|
* TinkerDifferent *
Retro Computing Community |
| Home | Forums | What's New | Search | Settings |
| Color Classic VGA Woes |
Forums > Vintage Apple > Macintosh > Compact Macs
|
Marconelly Tinkerer -------- Joined: May 2, 2025 Posts: 53 Likes: 38 |
Jun 13, 2025 - #21
More things happened today. First, I've replaced the 2nd optoisolator, but as I suspected, the voltages remained the same, and in general nothing changed. Then, I replaced the two 5600uF caps and one 3300uF cap with my preferred Panasonic ones. Again, no changes in voltages, but since the CC was now working fine in VGA anyway, I decided to just call it quits there and just enjoy the fruits of my repair.
And then, as I was playing around, I heard the ramping squeal of high voltage, and seconds later computer shut itself down :( I restarted it a minute later, and it again worked fine for about five minutes, then the same thing happened. So I took the board back out, desoldered my caps and put the originals back in. Started it up again, it worked fine for some minutes, but then again the squeal and the shutdown. Then, as I was taking the board back out again to remove the 2nd optoisolator and put back the original one, I noticed that the CRT molex cable was really stuck and couldn't be removed without some serious pulling. This didn't happen before, so I was puzzled by it. I thought that maybe the connector had some residue in it that got melted due to some arcing and caused this. With some force and lots of wiggling I managed to remove it, and then I sprayed lots of contact cleaner in there. I did also remove the 2nd optoisolator and put the original back in. With that done, the computer worked fine for the next whole half an hour, so I called it a day there. I'll keep testing tomorrow, but I actually suspect that molex connector was the culprit for this new problem, as I can't imagine the new optoisolator would cause it - especially seeing that replacing the 1st optoisolator actually fixed the original major problem with the board. I just hope that contact cleaner on molex did really fix this long term. Liked by JDWandjibsaramnim |
|
Marconelly Tinkerer -------- Joined: May 2, 2025 Posts: 53 Likes: 38 |
Jun 14, 2025 - #22
For a sanity check, today I've put back my preferred Panasonic capacitors back on the board. Then I've thoroughly cleaned the pins on the board where the CRT molex connector goes. Each of the four pins had some darkening on it - some residue or a burnt metal surface due to arcing? Not sure what it was but I've removed it thoroughly, and again cleaned with more contact cleaner. Assembled it all back, and had the computer running for almost two hours. Everything was perfectly stable, no weird sounds or anything. Phew! Lots of little things that can go wrong with these analog boards, other than just recapping.
Liked by jibsaramnimandJDW |
|
Marconelly Tinkerer -------- Joined: May 2, 2025 Posts: 53 Likes: 38 |
Jun 20, 2025 - #23
I just can't catch a break with this. After working perfectly for whole three days - and I used it a few hours each day - today the computer starting shutting down all on its own again, same way as it did before I thought I fixed it by cleaning the CRT connector. It seems it works fine for about five minutes, but I guess as soon as something in there gets warmed up, it shuts down.
No idea what to do now. Maybe replace those TDA4605 power delivery ICs? Replace some of those large transistors? Try to transplant the Flyback from the LC 575 board and do some adjustments to make it work like TechKnight showed in one of his videos? Or just give up and go back to my regular resolution board, where most things work fine anyway, if I use the fVGA utility :\ Liked by JDW |
|
JDW Administrator Japan -------- Joined: Sep 2, 2021 Posts: 2,535 Likes: 1,983 |
Jun 20, 2025 - #24
But the computer is working. If it was a blown component, I suspect it wouldn't ever work. And so, it could be the case of something over-heating, especially now that we are into the warmer months.
What you really need is a thermal camera. Then you can leave the back case off and check temperatures inside. I have a UTi260B, and here's how the inside of my Mac IIci look when I check its Radius Rocket card: The downside is they are a bit expensive, even if you get the iPhone attachment kind. I bought mine from Banggood in 2023, but I see the lowest price on AliExpress today: UNI-T UTI260B UTI260A Thermal Imaging Camera 256X192 Pixels Thermal Imager UTI260B+ PCB Circuit Floor Heating Tube Testing - AliExpress 1420Smarter Shopping, Better Living! Aliexpress.com
[Image: www.aliexpress.com]
www.aliexpress.com
Even then it's not a cheap device. Good, but not cheap. And I'm not sure how tariffs would be handled for folks based in the US.
|
|
Marconelly Tinkerer -------- Joined: May 2, 2025 Posts: 53 Likes: 38 |
Jun 20, 2025 - #25
The things is, it's really haphazard. Today again I've been able to use it for an entire hour, and it still keeps working just fine. Yesterday it wouldn't run for longer than 5 minutes at a time.
I keep suspecting that flyback on this board is dying - it's flat surface looks pretty cracked from the heat - which maybe could explain this weird behavior, if something inside is just slightly shorted, but it manifests only sometimes. In any case, it feels practically impossible to troubleshoot it when it can at times work for hours at a time. I would never have a real idea if replacing some component actually fixed it, unless I'd use it for days after. *edit* Not to forget, this board still doesn't quite reach 5V/12V. It's at 4.8/11.5V right now, so maybe I should start adjusting that PP7 pot which I believe affects the low voltage? I also need to check high voltages and possibly adjust PP1 for that. |
|
Marconelly Tinkerer -------- Joined: May 2, 2025 Posts: 53 Likes: 38 |
Jun 23, 2025 - #26
Right now, I've adjusted the PP7 pot, and managed to get the low voltage to be 4.998 / 5.004 V and 11.8. Up from 4.8V / 11.5V
- I can confirm with certainty now that PP7 affects both the 5V and 12V. Not sure if it affects anything else, but those two it affects for sure. - Turning PP7 clockwise lowers the voltage and turning it counter-clockwise increases the voltage (yes, it works in a counter intuitive way) - PP7 is very touchy. It took me many back and forth tries to adjust it from 4.8 to 5V as I kept over/undershooting slightly even though I was moving it in very, very small increments. While you can adjust it while the computer is running, I'd suggest adjusting it only bit-bit while the computer is off, then turning computer on briefly to measure the voltage, turning it off again and re-adjusting. - I measured voltages on the SCSI molex connector, as that's where I believe the raw analog board output can be measured, and since I'm sure the problem I'm having is solely with AB, that's what I want to measure. @JDW there is a much older thread here where you inquired about this pot, and I hope this clears things up a bit. I am now running the computer to see if it shuts down again, but later in the day I will measure voltages on the high voltage side and maybe adjust PP1 accordingly. From what I understand with the VGA mod, the high voltage is supposed to be 68.4V rather than the original 60V, and it can be measured on the test point TP1. Liked by JDW |
|
Marconelly Tinkerer -------- Joined: May 2, 2025 Posts: 53 Likes: 38 |
Jun 24, 2025 - #27
I found out where TP1 is and what it's connected to, so I can measure it from the top of the board.
I'm assuming I would measure between TP1 and say metal shielding that's connected to the ground? Would I be looking for 68.4V DC or AC here? I want to check this because even though the computer now can seemingly run for hours, it eventually does shut down on its own. Yesterday it was running two rounds for three hours each (with a brief manual shutdown in the middle) but eventually it shut down on its own. I guess even if it stays like this, I'll take it as a win. I doubt I'd ever use the CC for more than an hour or two at a time. *edit* So I measured 70V DC between TP1 and ground while there was a picture on the screen, and 84V for a brief period right after the bootup where there was still no picture on the screen. I guess that seems normal, so I probably shouldn't touch PP1 pot. Liked by JDW |
|
JDW Administrator Japan -------- Joined: Sep 2, 2021 Posts: 2,535 Likes: 1,983 |
Jun 25, 2025 - #28
[Image: CC_AnalogBoard.jpg]
[Image: CC-AnalogBoard_TOP.jpg] (I also marked PP7 with a green arrow.) As mentioned on PowerCC here, it's considered "risky" to adjust PP1 but perhaps "necessary" if someone has excessively thick black borders after the 640x480 mod and if first changing the value of capacitor CL26 doesn't result in the black border thickness reduction. The cautionary text on PowerCC is as follows (slightly rewritten by me for improved readability): The PP1 adjustment affects +60V (+84V after modding), +24V, and +8.4V. It affects the Geometry & Video adjustments pertaining to the following:
Mr. Tak says that if you want to adjust PP1, please adjust carefully while measuring voltage with a meter.
And yes, you can put your meter's Black GROUND lead to the metal shield which provides a good ground.
Liked by Marconelly |
|
Marconelly Tinkerer -------- Joined: May 2, 2025 Posts: 53 Likes: 38 |
Jun 25, 2025 - #29
Liked by JDW |
|
Marconelly Tinkerer -------- Joined: May 2, 2025 Posts: 53 Likes: 38 |
Jul 4, 2025 - #30
Looks like the last piece of the puzzle to get this board fully operational was to increase the picture adjustment R/G/B pots at the back of the board. I used to keep them pretty low to avoid sub-brightness being too high (I originally didn't know the VG2 pot can be used to correct this globally) and it seems like keeping these color pots very low was what contributed to the board shutting itself down after some time of running.
The reason I even readjusted these was simply that the picture brightness was too low, and I wanted to correct that. Now that I keep these pots much higher, I've been running the computer for hours on end every single day and it's been rock solid, plus the brightness is of course much better. No idea how or why those color pots affected the stability of the board, but I'm happy that it's all working now. Liked by ericandJDW |
|
JDW Administrator Japan -------- Joined: Sep 2, 2021 Posts: 2,535 Likes: 1,983 |
Jul 5, 2025 - #31
That's great to hear! Useful information too. But what did you mean when you said "sub-brightness"?
|
|
Marconelly Tinkerer -------- Joined: May 2, 2025 Posts: 53 Likes: 38 |
Jul 7, 2025 - #32
Liked by JDW |
|
JDW Administrator Japan -------- Joined: Sep 2, 2021 Posts: 2,535 Likes: 1,983 |
Jul 8, 2025 - #33
|
|
Marconelly Tinkerer -------- Joined: May 2, 2025 Posts: 53 Likes: 38 |
Jul 18, 2025 - #34
Another interesting find I just had. Now that I've got this board stable (mostly - it still seems to sometimes power off after hours of working fine) I decided to revisit my replacement of the second optoisolator.
So originally, after replacing the first optoisolator IC (the one close to the low voltage transformer) I got a stable low voltage. But after I replaced the second optoisolator (the one close to high voltage transformer) I suspected that my board became even less stable than it was before. So now that I've done further tweaks and made the board work much better, I figured I should try replacing that second optoisolator again. And yes, I can confirm that I got all kinds of trouble again after replacing it. Picture flickered in different colors, and the computer became unstable again. I swapped back the original optoisolator - and all is back to normal! But why? Why would a brand new part mess things up? The IC really does look new, and is made by Vishay if I recall correctly - I purchased it from DigiKey. The original IC is CNY75GB. My new one has CNY75B printed on it - and in the data sheet I see no difference between GB and B, and some data sheet I found even says that even though the GB part is made, the G is not printed on it. I did order the "CNY75GB" part from DigiKey, for what it's worth. Just a truly bizarre experience. |
|
JDW Administrator Japan -------- Joined: Sep 2, 2021 Posts: 2,535 Likes: 1,983 |
Jul 19, 2025 - #35
Returning to an earlier discussing in this thread...
I'm actually prepping a new video about swapping those components, which are these:
I ask only because I'm curious if the failure to swap them out, or if the act of swapping them out, contributed to any of the ongoing problems you are seeing. |
|
Marconelly Tinkerer -------- Joined: May 2, 2025 Posts: 53 Likes: 38 |
Jul 19, 2025 - #36
I have not replaced any of the diodes or resistors. They all look fine visually and no burn marks around any of them.
Only component (other than the capacitors) I replaced was one CNY75GB which had some corrosion on its legs. After that computer worked markedly better. But as soon as I replaced the other CNY75GB, it started working markedly worse. My latest endeavor, after returning the original second CNY75GB, was to reflow a few larger joints that maybe looked a bit suspect (although it was clear that a previous board owner already reflowed them). Right now, computer has been running for six hours with no issues. |
|
JDW Administrator Japan -------- Joined: Sep 2, 2021 Posts: 2,535 Likes: 1,983 |
Jul 19, 2025 - #37
I mentioned my thermal camera earlier in this thread, but it's not clear if you have one or not. If not, how do you gauge the temperature of individual components. You said some were "hot" in previous replies, but us that based on a finger touch alone? In the end, having a thermal camera might be the fast track to spot component overheating which very well could explain some oddball things going on with your machine. Lastly, you mention an optoisolator (aka Opto-coupler). Could you please post URLs to the factory part's datasheet and the datasheet of your replacement so we can compare them side-by-side? |
|
Marconelly Tinkerer -------- Joined: May 2, 2025 Posts: 53 Likes: 38 |
Jul 21, 2025 - #38
In particular with this optocoupler part, the issue with the new part is visible instantly, before anything has had a chance to warm up.
Here's the datasheet linked on that page: https://www.vishay.com/docs/83536/83536.pdf The original part on the board has the same model ID, but the IC itself is a little bigger (the pins still have the same spacing though) *edit* Just checked my other board which has a higher revision number (94xx vs 93xx which I was repairing) and on the 94xx board, they used a different optocoupler: CNY17-3: https://www.digikey.ca/en/products/detail/vishay-semiconductor-opto-division/CNY17-3/4071241 I might order a few of these and try them on that other board, if the specs seem right. |
|
JDW Administrator Japan -------- Joined: Sep 2, 2021 Posts: 2,535 Likes: 1,983 |
Jul 22, 2025 - #39
The 2 datasheets you mention are here...
CNY75: https://www.vishay.com/docs/83536/83536.pdf CNY17: https://www.vishay.com/docs/83606/cny17.pdf Both are drop-in compatible and typically require about 10mA to fully switch the transistor. CNY17 is a slightly better part overall but I don't see it as a magic cure for a problem because you already have a brand new CNY75 opto-coupler that seems to be working as it should (if getting enough current to switch its transistor). |
|
jibsaramnim Tinkerer South Korea -------- Joined: Mar 16, 2024 Posts: 36 Likes: 25 |
Jul 29, 2025 - #40
This might be a good place to mention that Luke from Console5 has graciously answered my request of turning your list of diodes/resistors into a ready to buy kit. His kits have been a life saver for folk like me who don't really have easy access to Mouser or the like. Here's the link, in case it is of use to anyone else following along: https://console5.com/store/macintos...575-630-0349-630-0355-resistor-diode-kit.html I have received the kit a few weeks ago but have not yet gotten around to opening up my CC again, I'm eagerly awaiting a moment when I can though. Liked by Kai Robinson |
| << First | < Prev | Page 2 of 4 | Next > | Last >> |
| Home | Forums | What's New | Search | Bookmarks | RSS | Original | Settings |
| XenForo Retro Proxy by TinkerDifferent.com |